酿酒小麦与非酿酒小麦品质差异分析及专用品种选育标准
作者:
作者单位:

1安徽科技工程大学农学院,安徽 凤阳 233100;2生物育种安徽省实验室,安徽 合肥 230001;3山东省 农业科学院,作物研究所,山东 济南 250100;4山东省 农业科学院,小麦玉米国家工程研究中心,山东 济南 250100;5山东省 农业科学院,小麦育种全国重点实验室,山东 济南 250100;6山东省 农业科学院,农业农村部黄淮北部小麦生物学与遗传育种重点实验室,山东 济南 250100;7山东省 农业科学院,山东省小麦技术创新中心,山东 济南 250100

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

生物育种安徽省实验室重大创新任务(2025SWYZ0310);高校理工科教师赴企业挂职实践计划项目(2024jsqygz66);凤阳县科技项目(2024NY-03);小麦科技创新团队项目(2025KJCXTD001)。


Quality Differences of Brewing and Non-Brewing Wheat and Breeding Standards for Special Varieties
Author:
Affiliation:

1College of Agriculture, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, Anhui, China;2Bio-breeding Laboratory of Anhui Province, Hefei 230001, Anhui, China;3a.Crop Research Institute;3b.National Engineering Research Center of Wheat and Maize;3cState Key Laboratory of Wheat Breeding;3dKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement in North Yellow & Huai River Valley;3e.Shandong Provincial Technology Innovation Center for Wheat, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    为厘清酿酒小麦的品质特性,以10个酿酒小麦和4个非酿酒小麦为材料,系统比较这2类小麦在籽粒物理性状、加工品质、淀粉质量分数、淀粉理化特性等方面的差异。结果表明:(1)酿酒小麦的平均籽粒硬度指数为54.59%,蛋白质质量分数为9.39%,低于非酿酒小麦;平均总淀粉质量分数为61.94%,支链淀粉质量分数为72.98%,高于非酿酒小麦;淀粉理化特性指标显示酿酒小麦平均峰值黏度为5 492 mPa·s,崩解值为2 209 mPa·s,溶解度为9.77%,高于非酿酒小麦;平均糊化温度为69.44 ℃,析水率为40.02%,低于非酿酒小麦;相关性分析显示硬度指数与蛋白质质量分数呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与总淀粉质量分数呈极显著负相关(P<0.01),蛋白质质量分数与总淀粉质量分数呈极显著负相关(P<0.01)。(2)聚类分析将14个品种划分为3个类群,类群Ⅲ包含8个酿酒小麦品种,表现为较高的总淀粉质量分数和较低的蛋白质质量分数,适配酿酒工艺。综合分析,选育酿酒小麦推荐的阈值为:蛋白质质量分数≤12%、总淀粉质量分数≥60%、籽粒硬度45%~60%、峰值黏度≥5 000 mPa·s、糊化温度≤70 ℃、析水率≤40%,这些标准兼顾了酿酒工艺的糖化效率与发酵稳定性,为后续酿酒小麦新品种选育提供了理论依据。

    Abstract:

    To clarify the quality characteristics of brewing wheat,10 brewing and 4 non-brewing wheat varieties were used as materials,to systematically compare the differences in grain physical traits, processing quality, starch content and starch physicochemical properties between the two groups. The results showed that:(1)The brewing wheat had an average grain hardness index of 54.59% and protein content of 9.39%, which were lower than those of non-brewing wheat. The average total starch content was 61.94% and amylopectin content was 72.98%, which were higher than those of non-brewing wheat. The starch physicochemical indexes indicated that the average peak viscosity, breakdown value and solubility of brewing wheat were 5 492 mPa·s, 2 209 mPa·s and 9.77%, respectively, with higher value than those of non-brewing wheat. The average gelatinization temperature was 69.44 ℃ and water separation rate was 40.02%, with lower value than those of non-brewing wheat. Correlation analysis confirmed that grain hardness index was extremely significantly and positively correlated with protein content(P<0.01), but extremely significantly and negatively correlated with total starch content(P<0.01), while protein content was extremely significantly and negatively correlated with total starch content(P<0.01). (2)The 14 varieties were divided into three groups based on cluster analysis. Group Ⅲ contained 8 brewing wheat varieties, which were characterized by high total starch content and low protein content and well adapted to brewing processes. Based on comprehensive analysis, the recommended thresholds for breeding brewing wheat were as follows: protein content≤12%, total starch content≥60%, grain hardness ranging from 45% to 60%, peak viscosity≥5 000 mPa·s, gelatinization temperature≤70 ℃, water separation rate≤40%. These criteria coordinate the saccharification efficiency and fermentation stability during the brewing process, and provide a theoretical reference for the selective breeding of new brewing wheat varieties.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

曾庆雨,胡宁俊,刘秀坤,段小艳,郑甲成.酿酒小麦与非酿酒小麦品质差异分析及专用品种选育标准[J].西昌学院学报(自然科学版),2026,40(2):13-24.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-20
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-29
  • 录用日期:2026-04-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-08